(m4.info)Composition


Prev: Stacks Up: Conditionals
Enter node , (file) or (file)node

6.7 Building macros with macros
===============================

Since m4 is a macro language, it is possible to write macros that can
build other macros.  First on the list is a way to automate the creation
of blind macros.

 -- Composite: define_blind (NAME, [VALUE])
     Defines NAME as a blind macro, such that NAME will expand to VALUE
     only when given explicit arguments.  VALUE should not be the result
     of 'defn' (Note: Defn).  This macro is only recognized with
     parameters, and results in an empty string.

   Defining a macro to define another macro can be a bit tricky.  We
want to use a literal '$#' in the argument to the nested 'define'.
However, if '$' and '#' are adjacent in the definition of
'define_blind', then it would be expanded as the number of arguments to
'define_blind' rather than the intended number of arguments to NAME.
The solution is to pass the difficult characters through extra arguments
to a helper macro '_define_blind'.  When composing macros, it is a
common idiom to need a helper macro to concatenate text that forms
parameters in the composed macro, rather than interpreting the text as a
parameter of the composing macro.

   As for the limitation against using 'defn', there are two reasons.
If a macro was previously defined with 'define_blind', then it can
safely be renamed to a new blind macro using plain 'define'; using
'define_blind' to rename it just adds another layer of 'ifelse',
occupying memory and slowing down execution.  And if a macro is a
builtin, then it would result in an attempt to define a macro consisting
of both text and a builtin token; this is not supported, and the builtin
token is flattened to an empty string.

   With that explanation, here's the definition, and some sample usage.
Notice that 'define_blind' is itself a blind macro.

     $ m4 -d
     define(`define_blind', `ifelse(`$#', `0', ``$0'',
     `_$0(`$1', `$2', `$'`#', `$'`0')')')
     =>
     define(`_define_blind', `define(`$1',
     `ifelse(`$3', `0', ``$4'', `$2')')')
     =>
     define_blind
     =>define_blind
     define_blind(`foo', `arguments were $*')
     =>
     foo
     =>foo
     foo(`bar')
     =>arguments were bar
     define(`blah', defn(`foo'))
     =>
     blah
     =>blah
     blah(`a', `b')
     =>arguments were a,b
     defn(`blah')
     =>ifelse(`$#', `0', ``$0'', `arguments were $*')

   Another interesting composition tactic is argument "currying", or
factoring a macro that takes multiple arguments for use in a context
that provides exactly one argument.

 -- Composite: curry (MACRO, ...)
     Expand to a macro call that takes exactly one argument, then
     appends that argument to the original arguments and invokes MACRO
     with the resulting list of arguments.

   A demonstration of currying makes the intent of this macro a little
more obvious.  The macro 'stack_foreach' mentioned earlier is an example
of a context that provides exactly one argument to a macro name.  But
coupled with currying, we can invoke 'reverse' with two arguments for
each definition of a macro stack.  This example uses the file
'm4-1.4.18/examples/curry.m4' included in the distribution.

     $ m4 -I examples
     include(`curry.m4')include(`stack.m4')
     =>
     define(`reverse', `ifelse(`$#', `0', , `$#', `1', ``$1'',
                               `reverse(shift($@)), `$1'')')
     =>
     pushdef(`a', `1')pushdef(`a', `2')pushdef(`a', `3')
     =>
     stack_foreach(`a', `:curry(`reverse', `4')')
     =>:1, 4:2, 4:3, 4
     curry(`curry', `reverse', `1')(`2')(`3')
     =>3, 2, 1

   Now for the implementation.  Notice how 'curry' leaves off with a
macro name but no open parenthesis, while still in the middle of
collecting arguments for '$1'.  The macro '_curry' is the helper macro
that takes one argument, then adds it to the list and finally supplies
the closing parenthesis.  The use of a comma inside the 'shift' call
allows currying to also work for a macro that takes one argument,
although it often makes more sense to invoke that macro directly rather
than going through 'curry'.

     $ m4 -I examples
     undivert(`curry.m4')dnl
     =>divert(`-1')
     =># curry(macro, args)
     =># Expand to a macro call that takes one argument, then invoke
     =># macro(args, extra).
     =>define(`curry', `$1(shift($@,)_$0')
     =>define(`_curry', ``$1')')
     =>divert`'dnl

   Unfortunately, with M4 1.4.x, 'curry' is unable to handle builtin
tokens, which are silently flattened to the empty string when passed
through another text macro.  This limitation will be lifted in a future
release of M4.

   Putting the last few concepts together, it is possible to copy or
rename an entire stack of macro definitions.

 -- Composite: copy (SOURCE, DEST)
 -- Composite: rename (SOURCE, DEST)
     Ensure that DEST is undefined, then define it to the same stack of
     definitions currently in SOURCE.  'copy' leaves SOURCE unchanged,
     while 'rename' undefines SOURCE.  There are only a few macros, such
     as 'copy' or 'defn', which cannot be copied via this macro.

   The implementation is relatively straightforward (although since it
uses 'curry', it is unable to copy builtin macros, such as the second
definition of 'a' as a synonym for 'divnum'.  See if you can design a
version that works around this limitation, or Note: Answers.
).

     $ m4 -I examples
     include(`curry.m4')include(`stack.m4')
     =>
     define(`rename', `copy($@)undefine(`$1')')dnl
     define(`copy', `ifdef(`$2', `errprint(`$2 already defined
     ')m4exit(`1')',
        `stack_foreach(`$1', `curry(`pushdef', `$2')')')')dnl
     pushdef(`a', `1')pushdef(`a', defn(`divnum'))pushdef(`a', `2')
     =>
     copy(`a', `b')
     =>
     rename(`b', `c')
     =>
     a b c
     =>2 b 2
     popdef(`a', `c')c a
     => 0
     popdef(`a', `c')a c
     =>1 1


automatically generated by info2www version 1.2.2.9