(octave.info)Demonstration Functions


Prev: Test Functions Up: Test and Demo Functions
Enter node , (file) or (file)node

B.2 Demonstration Functions
===========================

 -- : demo NAME
 -- : demo NAME N
 -- : demo ("NAME")
 -- : demo ("NAME", N)

     Run example code block N associated with the function NAME.

     If N is not specified, all examples are run.

     The preferred location for example code blocks is embedded within
     the script m-file immediately following the code that it exercises.
     Alternatively, the examples may be stored in a file with the same
     name but no extension located on Octave’s load path.  To separate
     examples from regular script code all lines are prefixed by ‘%!’.
     Each example must also be introduced by the keyword "demo" flush
     left to the prefix with no intervening spaces.  The remainder of
     the example can contain arbitrary Octave code.  For example:

          %!demo
          %! t = 0:0.01:2*pi;
          %! x = sin (t);
          %! plot (t, x);
          %! title ("one cycle of a sine wave");
          %! #-------------------------------------------------
          %! # the figure window shows one cycle of a sine wave

     Note that the code is displayed before it is executed so that a
     simple comment at the end suffices for labeling what is being
     shown.  For plots, labeling can also be done with ‘title’ or
     ‘text’.  It is generally *not* necessary to use ‘disp’ or ‘printf’
     within the demo.

     Demos are run in a stand-alone function environment with no access
     to external variables.  This means that every demo must have
     separate initialization code.  Alternatively, all demos can be
     combined into a single large demo with the code

          %! input ("Press <enter> to continue: ", "s");

     between the sections, but this usage is discouraged.  Other
     techniques to avoid multiple initialization blocks include using
     multiple plots with a new ‘figure’ command between each plot, or
     using ‘subplot’ to put multiple plots in the same window.

     Finally, because ‘demo’ evaluates within a function context it is
     not possible to define new functions within the code.  Anonymous
     functions make a good substitute in most instances.  If function
     blocks *must* be used then the code ‘eval (example ("function",
     n))’ will allow Octave to see them.  This has its own problems,
     however, as ‘eval’ only evaluates one line or statement at a time.
     In this case the function declaration must be wrapped with "if 1
     <demo stuff> endif" where "if" is on the same line as "demo".  For
     example:

          %!demo if 1
          %!  function y = f(x)
          %!    y = x;
          %!  endfunction
          %!  f(3)
          %! endif

     See also: Note: rundemos, Note: example,
     Note: test.

 -- : example NAME
 -- : example NAME N
 -- : example ("NAME")
 -- : example ("NAME", N)
 -- : [S, IDX] = example (...)

     Display the code for example N associated with the function NAME,
     but do not run it.

     If N is not specified, all examples are displayed.

     When called with output arguments, the examples are returned in the
     form of a string S, with IDX indicating the ending position of the
     various examples.

     See ‘demo’ for a complete explanation.

     See also: Note: demo, Note: test.

 -- : rundemos ()
 -- : rundemos (DIRECTORY)
     Execute built-in demos for all m-files in the specified DIRECTORY.

     Demo blocks in any C++ source files (‘*.cc’) will also be executed
     for use with dynamically linked oct-file functions.

     If no directory is specified, operate on all directories in
     Octave’s search path for functions.

     See also: Note: demo, Note: runtests, Note:
     path.

 -- : runtests ()
 -- : runtests (DIRECTORY)
     Execute built-in tests for all m-files in the specified DIRECTORY.

     Test blocks in any C++ source files (‘*.cc’) will also be executed
     for use with dynamically linked oct-file functions.

     If no directory is specified, operate on all directories in
     Octave’s search path for functions.

     See also: Note: rundemos, Note: test, Note:
     path.

 -- : speed (F, INIT, MAX_N, F2, TOL)
 -- : [ORDER, N, T_F, T_F2] = speed (...)

     Determine the execution time of an expression (F) for various input
     values (N).

     The N are log-spaced from 1 to MAX_N.  For each N, an
     initialization expression (INIT) is computed to create any data
     needed for the test.  If a second expression (F2) is given then the
     execution times of the two expressions are compared.  When called
     without output arguments the results are printed to stdout and
     displayed graphically.

     ‘F’
          The code expression to evaluate.

     ‘MAX_N’
          The maximum test length to run.  The default value is 100.
          Alternatively, use ‘[min_n, max_n]’ or specify the N exactly
          with ‘[n1, n2, ..., nk]’.

     ‘INIT’
          Initialization expression for function argument values.  Use K
          for the test number and N for the size of the test.  This
          should compute values for all variables used by F.  Note that
          INIT will be evaluated first for k = 0, so things which are
          constant throughout the test series can be computed once.  The
          default value is ‘X = randn (N, 1)’.

     ‘F2’
          An alternative expression to evaluate, so that the speed of
          two expressions can be directly compared.  The default is
          ‘[]’.

     ‘TOL’
          Tolerance used to compare the results of expression F and
          expression F2.  If TOL is positive, the tolerance is an
          absolute one.  If TOL is negative, the tolerance is a relative
          one.  The default is ‘eps’.  If TOL is ‘Inf’, then no
          comparison will be made.

     ‘ORDER’
          The time complexity of the expression O(a*n^p).  This is a
          structure with fields ‘a’ and ‘p’.

     ‘N’
          The values N for which the expression was calculated *AND* the
          execution time was greater than zero.

     ‘T_F’
          The nonzero execution times recorded for the expression F in
          seconds.

     ‘T_F2’
          The nonzero execution times recorded for the expression F2 in
          seconds.  If required, the mean time ratio is simply ‘mean
          (T_f ./ T_f2)’.

     The slope of the execution time graph shows the approximate power
     of the asymptotic running time O(n^p).  This power is plotted for
     the region over which it is approximated (the latter half of the
     graph).  The estimated power is not very accurate, but should be
     sufficient to determine the general order of an algorithm.  It
     should indicate if, for example, the implementation is unexpectedly
     O(n^2) rather than O(n) because it extends a vector each time
     through the loop rather than pre-allocating storage.  In the
     current version of Octave, the following is not the expected O(n).

          speed ("for i = 1:n, y{i} = x(i); endfor", "", [1000, 10000])

     But it is if you preallocate the cell array ‘y’:

          speed ("for i = 1:n, y{i} = x(i); endfor", ...
                 "x = rand (n, 1); y = cell (size (x));", [1000, 10000])

     An attempt is made to approximate the cost of individual
     operations, but it is wildly inaccurate.  You can improve the
     stability somewhat by doing more work for each ‘n’.  For example:

          speed ("airy(x)", "x = rand (n, 10)", [10000, 100000])

     When comparing two different expressions (F, F2), the slope of the
     line on the speedup ratio graph should be larger than 1 if the new
     expression is faster.  Better algorithms have a shallow slope.
     Generally, vectorizing an algorithm will not change the slope of
     the execution time graph, but will shift it relative to the
     original.  For example:

          speed ("sum (x)", "", [10000, 100000], ...
                 "v = 0; for i = 1:length (x), v += x(i); endfor")

     The following is a more complex example.  If there was an original
     version of ‘xcorr’ using for loops and a second version using an
     FFT, then one could compare the run speed for various lags as
     follows, or for a fixed lag with varying vector lengths as follows:

          speed ("xcorr (x, n)", "x = rand (128, 1);", 100,
                 "xcorr_orig (x, n)", -100*eps)
          speed ("xcorr (x, 15)", "x = rand (20+n, 1);", 100,
                 "xcorr_orig (x, n)", -100*eps)

     Assuming one of the two versions is in xcorr_orig, this would
     compare their speed and their output values.  Note that the FFT
     version is not exact, so one must specify an acceptable tolerance
     on the comparison ‘100*eps’.  In this case, the comparison should
     be computed relatively, as ‘abs ((X - Y) ./ Y)’ rather than
     absolutely as ‘abs (X - Y)’.

     Type ‘example ("speed")’ to see some real examples or ‘demo
     ("speed")’ to run them.


automatically generated by info2www version 1.2.2.9