(octave.info)Real Life Example

---

Prev: Iterative Techniques Up: Sparse Matrices

---

Enter node , (file) or (file)node

22.4 Real Life Example using Sparse Matrices
============================================

A common application for sparse matrices is in the solution of Finite
Element Models.  Finite element models allow numerical solution of
partial differential equations that do not have closed form solutions,
typically because of the complex shape of the domain.

   In order to motivate this application, we consider the boundary value
Laplace equation.  This system can model scalar potential fields, such
as heat or electrical potential.  Given a medium Omega with boundary
dOmega.  At all points on the dOmega the boundary conditions are known,
and we wish to calculate the potential in Omega.  Boundary conditions
may specify the potential (Dirichlet boundary condition), its normal
derivative across the boundary (Neumann boundary condition), or a
weighted sum of the potential and its derivative (Cauchy boundary
condition).

   In a thermal model, we want to calculate the temperature in Omega and
know the boundary temperature (Dirichlet condition) or heat flux (from
which we can calculate the Neumann condition by dividing by the thermal
conductivity at the boundary).  Similarly, in an electrical model, we
want to calculate the voltage in Omega and know the boundary voltage
(Dirichlet) or current (Neumann condition after diving by the electrical
conductivity).  In an electrical model, it is common for much of the
boundary to be electrically isolated; this is a Neumann boundary
condition with the current equal to zero.

   The simplest finite element models will divide Omega into simplexes
(triangles in 2D, pyramids in 3D).

   The following example creates a simple rectangular 2-D electrically
conductive medium with 10 V and 20 V imposed on opposite sides
(Dirichlet boundary conditions).  All other edges are electrically
isolated.

        node_y = [1;1.2;1.5;1.8;2]*ones(1,11);
        node_x = ones(5,1)*[1,1.05,1.1,1.2, ...
                  1.3,1.5,1.7,1.8,1.9,1.95,2];
        nodes = [node_x(:), node_y(:)];

        [h,w] = size (node_x);
        elems = [];
        for idx = 1:w-1
          widx = (idx-1)*h;
          elems = [elems; ...
            widx+[(1:h-1);(2:h);h+(1:h-1)]'; ...
            widx+[(2:h);h+(2:h);h+(1:h-1)]' ];
        endfor

        E = size (elems,1); # No. of simplices
        N = size (nodes,1); # No. of vertices
        D = size (elems,2); # dimensions+1

   This creates a N-by-2 matrix ‘nodes’ and a E-by-3 matrix ‘elems’ with
values, which define finite element triangles:

       nodes(1:7,:)'
         1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.05 1.05 ...
         1.00 1.20 1.50 1.80 2.00 1.00 1.20 ...

       elems(1:7,:)'
         1    2    3    4    2    3    4 ...
         2    3    4    5    7    8    9 ...
         6    7    8    9    6    7    8 ...

   Using a first order FEM, we approximate the electrical conductivity
distribution in Omega as constant on each simplex (represented by the
vector ‘conductivity’).  Based on the finite element geometry, we first
calculate a system (or stiffness) matrix for each simplex (represented
as 3-by-3 elements on the diagonal of the element-wise system matrix
‘SE’).  Based on ‘SE’ and a N-by-DE connectivity matrix ‘C’,
representing the connections between simplices and vertices, the global
connectivity matrix ‘S’ is calculated.

       ## Element conductivity
       conductivity = [1*ones(1,16), ...
              2*ones(1,48), 1*ones(1,16)];

       ## Connectivity matrix
       C = sparse ((1:D*E), reshape (elems', ...
              D*E, 1), 1, D*E, N);

       ## Calculate system matrix
       Siidx = floor ([0:D*E-1]'/D) * D * ...
              ones(1,D) + ones(D*E,1)*(1:D) ;
       Sjidx = [1:D*E]'*ones (1,D);
       Sdata = zeros (D*E,D);
       dfact = factorial (D-1);
       for j = 1:E
          a = inv ([ones(D,1), ...
              nodes(elems(j,:), :)]);
          const = conductivity(j) * 2 / ...
              dfact / abs (det (a));
          Sdata(D*(j-1)+(1:D),:) = const * ...
              a(2:D,:)' * a(2:D,:);
       endfor
       ## Element-wise system matrix
       SE = sparse(Siidx,Sjidx,Sdata);
       ## Global system matrix
       S = C'* SE *C;

   The system matrix acts like the conductivity ‘S’ in Ohm’s law ‘S * V
= I’.  Based on the Dirichlet and Neumann boundary conditions, we are
able to solve for the voltages at each vertex ‘V’.

       ## Dirichlet boundary conditions
       D_nodes = [1:5, 51:55];
       D_value = [10*ones(1,5), 20*ones(1,5)];

       V = zeros (N,1);
       V(D_nodes) = D_value;
       idx = 1:N; # vertices without Dirichlet
                  # boundary condns
       idx(D_nodes) = [];

       ## Neumann boundary conditions.  Note that
       ## N_value must be normalized by the
       ## boundary length and element conductivity
       N_nodes = [];
       N_value = [];

       Q = zeros (N,1);
       Q(N_nodes) = N_value;

       V(idx) = S(idx,idx) \ ( Q(idx) - ...
                 S(idx,D_nodes) * V(D_nodes));

   Finally, in order to display the solution, we show each solved
voltage value in the z-axis for each simplex vertex.

       elemx = elems(:,[1,2,3,1])';
       xelems = reshape (nodes(elemx, 1), 4, E);
       yelems = reshape (nodes(elemx, 2), 4, E);
       velems = reshape (V(elemx), 4, E);
       plot3 (xelems,yelems,velems,"k");
       print "grid.eps";